How do you .. no. You are male. Don't answer that. I do not understand why any of you think tennis shoes and one pair of dress shoes are enough.
Considering that Doug breached it earlier to loan me his laptop, I would say that the sanctity is not inviolable. If you have some idea where I might have thrown a shoe last night, please, let me know.
Hiking boots and one pair of dress shoes. Hiking boots are more practical than tennis shoes.
The sanctity would have been inviolable if you were looking for shoes in your underwear, is what I meant. I'll send a couple of dupes on over to help turn the room upside down.
You're other shoe's in the bathroom under the sink. And before you ask, no, I don't know why it's there or how it got there. And if you'd said that's what you were looking for instead of wandering around and muttering in French about I could have told you. Jeeze, don't your roommates do this for you when we're back at home?
Like I said, depending on the definition of 'fit', it would be doable. It's like, what is the definition of 'is'? And don't even begin to suggest things like thong, because, just no.
Hmph. She very often has intelligent things to say, because of being really smart. Also there are the distracting mental images, which yes, I knew she was doing on purpose. So it makes perfect sense to me.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 03:31 pm (UTC)Then I wouldn't have to go looking for them again.
I am nervous only because I cannot find my shoes.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 03:35 pm (UTC)And I know where they both are. :)
Are you decent enough for me to breach the inviolable sanctity of the girls' suite and help you look for your shoes?
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 03:44 pm (UTC)How do you .. no. You are male. Don't answer that. I do not understand why any of you think tennis shoes and one pair of dress shoes are enough.
Considering that Doug breached it earlier to loan me his laptop, I would say that the sanctity is not inviolable. If you have some idea where I might have thrown a shoe last night, please, let me know.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 03:46 pm (UTC)The sanctity would have been inviolable if you were looking for shoes in your underwear, is what I meant. I'll send a couple of dupes on over to help turn the room upside down.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 04:14 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 06:13 pm (UTC)You're other shoe's in the bathroom under the sink. And before you ask, no, I don't know why it's there or how it got there. And if you'd said that's what you were looking for instead of wandering around and muttering in French about I could have told you. Jeeze, don't your roommates do this for you when we're back at home?
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-27 10:58 am (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-28 06:31 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-28 07:33 pm (UTC)I'm affectionate! I just...she has a lot of shoes. and she loses them a lot.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-28 07:44 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-28 11:02 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-29 07:31 am (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 06:25 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 06:27 pm (UTC)And don't be evil Ali. Or, at least, don't be _too_ evil...
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 06:28 pm (UTC)Kitty, we need to talk too.
Moi? Evil? Nah.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 06:47 pm (UTC)And yes, you're very evil.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 07:07 pm (UTC)*grins*
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 07:28 pm (UTC)(And honestly, like I ever write these things without knowing he's going to see them...)
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 07:36 pm (UTC);)
(Heh. I wonder when he'll catch on to that one? ;) )
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 07:47 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 07:55 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 08:00 pm (UTC)Wouldn't put it past him, as he is, in actual fact, the cutest/sweetest boy in the world, hands down, no question.
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 08:53 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 08:54 pm (UTC)*grins*
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 09:15 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 08:53 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 09:59 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 10:03 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 10:15 pm (UTC)But then, our discussion about distracting clothing is how you ended up with that fantastic jacket...
Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 10:25 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 10:30 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 11:09 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 11:10 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 11:12 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 11:14 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-25 11:08 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2004-03-26 08:13 am (UTC)Ok, that was just a wierd idea. Ignore me.